“For the first time in years we produced an honest budget,” President Obama said today before signing the Omnibus spending bill containing some 8,500 earmarks. The bill totals a stunning $410 billion — maybe $8 billion in earmarks and waste accorning to budget watchdogs.
This follows the economic stimulus bill of some $700 billion which will soar to about $1 trillion due to interest payments on the debt.
Senator John McCain (R-AZ) said if the president was serious about doing away with earmarks, building an honest budget and holding down the debt he would have vetoed the Omnibus.
McCain called this action by Congress and the president “irresponsible,” “generational theft,” and “egregious.”
President Obama explained before he signed the omnibus in secret and out of the glare of media and cameras: “Earmarks might not be our highest priority….”
Well, if you lost your job or your home, that money on a study of pig smell earmark might have saved enough money to, never mind…..
McCain said Obama “either doesn’t get it or chooses not to attack the evil of earmarks…”
McCain was interviewed on Fox News.
White House Budget Chief Says President Obama Will Ignore Earmarks for At Least a Year
o Leadership: It’ll Take More Than Money to Fix This Crisis
The president may not have what it takes
Obama Doesn’t Understand What Many Americans Are Thinking
All The President’s Men: Where’s The Congressional Oversight?
Economic Situation Demads Nation, Politics With War Mindset
China Provoked Obama; Now Works To Smooth Situation: Why?
Losing Terror War? Al Qaeda, Afghanistan, Iran
Obama Policy On Gitmo, Taliban, Afghanistan, Intel: As Stupid as It Gets
Buffett: Obama not at war; has toxic message machine on economy
Voters’ Obama Folly Coming Home to Roost
By PHILIP ELLIOTT, Associated Press Writer
Acknowledging it’s an “imperfect” bill, President Barack Obama said Wednesday he will accept a $410 billion spending package that includes billions in earmarks like those he promised to curb in last year’s campaign. But he insisted the bill must signal an “end to the old way of doing business.”
The massive measure funding federal agencies through the fall contains nearly 8,000 pet projects, known as earmarks and denounced by critics as pork.
Obama defended earmarks when they’re “done right,” allowing lawmakers to direct money to worthy projects in their districts. But he said they’ve been abused, and he promised to work with Congress to curb them.
“I am signing an imperfect omnibus bill because it’s necessary for the ongoing functions of government,” Obama declared. “But I also view this as a departure point for more far-reaching change.”
In a sign of his discomfort with the bill, Obama planned to sign the bill quietly rather than in public. He declined to answer a shouted reporters’ question about why.
Running for president, Obama denounced the many pet projects as wasteful and open to abuse — and vowed to rein them in.
Explaining his decision, Obama said that future earmarks must have a “legitimate and worthy public purpose”, and the any earmark for a private company should be subject to competitive bidding rules. Plus he said he’ll “work with Congress” to eliminate any the administration objects to.
But he acknowledged that earmarks have bred “cynicism”, and he declared, “This piece of legislation must mark an end to the old way of doing business.”
White House officials in recent weeks have dismissed criticism of the earmarks in the bill, saying the legislation was a remnant of last year and that the president planned to turn his attention to future spending instead of looking backward.
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said Obama wouldn’t be the first president to sign legislation that he viewed as less than ideal. Asked whether Obama had second thoughts about signing the bill, Gibbs’ reply was curt: “No.”
Obama’s modest set of reforms builds upon changes initiated by Republicans in 2006 and strengthened by Democrats two years ago. Most importantly, every earmark and its sponsor must be made public.
In new steps — outlined in concert with House Democratic leaders Wednesday morning — the House Appropriations Committee will submit every earmark to the appropriate executive branch agency for a review. And any earmark designed to go to for-profit companies would have to be awarded through a competitive bidding process.
But perhaps the most tangible change may be Obama’s promise to resurrect the long-defunct process by which the president proposes to cut spending from bills that he has signed into law.
Under this so-called rescissions process, the White House sends Congress a roster of cuts for its consideration. Congress is free to ignore the cuts, but both Obama and senior members like Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey, D-Wis., say they want to use it to clean out bad earmarks that make it through the process.
But Obama declined to endorse a stronger process advocated by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and others, that would have required Congress to vote on a presidential rescission earmark package. Senior Democrats dislike the idea even though many of them backed it in the early-to-mid 1990s.
During his presidential campaign, Obama promised to force Congress to curb its pork-barrel-spending ways. Yet the bill sent from the Democratic-controlled Congress to the White House on Tuesday contained 7,991 earmarks totaling $5.5 billion, according to calculations by the Republican staff of the House Appropriations Committee.
The 1,132-page bill has an extraordinary reach, wrapping together nine spending bills to fund the annual operating budgets of every Cabinet department except Defense, Homeland Security and Veterans Affairs. Among the many earmarks are $485,000 for a boarding school for at-risk native students in western Alaska and $1.2 million for Helen Keller International so the nonprofit can provide eyeglasses to students with poor vision.