Archive for the ‘government’ Category

U.N. ‘Climate Change’ Plan Would Likely Shift Trillions to Form New World Economy

March 27, 2009

Here is why you might think more about a president of the United States that favors a stronger UN and even a world government along with new “climate change” rules, regulations and spending….  We pay: they play….

Don’t forget this is the same UN whose leader called the U.S. a “deadbeat” nation a few short weeks ago:

From March 12: “

Speaking at a monthly briefing with reporters this morning, United Nations Secretary-General (SG) Ban Ki-Moon acknowledged that he referred to the United States as a “deadbeat” donor during a meeting yesterday with members of Congress. A Republican on the House Foreign Relations Committee, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen was clearly irked telling reporters later that the United States contributes “a whole lot of taxpaper dollars to the UN and doesn’t deserve to be called a deadbeat.”

“My point was simply that the United Nations needs the full support of the United States, ” Ban Ki-moon responded at the press conference today. “The United States is our largest contributor, and it is hard to follow up with few funds for growing peacekeeping missions and other activities.”

http://talkradionews.com/2009/03/uns-ba
n-ki-moon-questioned-on-deadbeat-comm
ent-on-united-states-arrears-of-over-1-billion/

********************

 A United Nations document on “climate change” that will be distributed to a major environmental conclave next week envisions a huge reordering of the world economy, likely involving trillions of dollars in wealth transfer, millions of job losses and gains, new taxes, industrial relocations, new tariffs and subsidies, and complicated payments for greenhouse gas abatement schemes and carbon taxes — all under the supervision of the world body.

By George Russell
Fox News

Those and other results are blandly discussed in a discretely worded United Nations “information note” on potential consequences of the measures that industrialized countries will likely have to take to implement the Copenhagen Accord, the successor to the Kyoto Treaty, after it is negotiated and signed by December 2009. The Obama administration has said it supports the treaty process if, in the words of a U.S. State Department spokesman, it can come up with an “effective framework” for dealing with global warming.

The 16-page note, obtained by FOX News, will be distributed to participants at a mammoth negotiating session that starts on March 29 in Bonn, Germany, the first of three sessions intended to hammer out the actual commitments involved in the new deal.

In the stultifying language that is normal for important U.N. conclaves, the negotiators are known as the “Ad Hoc Working Group On Further Commitments For Annex I Parties Under the Kyoto Protocol.” Yet the consequences of their negotiations, if enacted, would be nothing short of world-changing.

Read the rest:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/
0,2933,510937,00.html

Economy, “Foreign Forces” Trying to Destabilize Russia?

March 26, 2009

Foreign forces are using the economic crisis to  destabilize the political situation in Russia, asserted State Duma Speaker Boris Gryzlov.
    
“We  already  see  manifestations  of  political  extremism.  I  am speaking  about  attempts to destabilize the country, taken both outside and inside Russia,” Gryzlov said at a meeting of the Supreme and General Councils of the United Russia party in Moscow on Thursday.
    
“We  are  now seeing attempts when people who are unhappy are given flags, and sometimes these are flags of foreign countries,” he said.
    
“We have seen protest rallies in Primorye, were the protesters were carrying Japanese flags. It is a fact,” Gryzlov said.

–Interfax

Resistance grows to Obama’s bigger government

March 22, 2009

“We’re in the midst of a huge political battle, which is being obscured behind a financial crisis,” said Bruce Kogut, professor of ethics and corporate governance at Columbia University. “If the financial crisis wasn’t here we’d be having this battle anyway.”

“The question I think we need to figure out as a country is what is the proper role of government?” said David Moss, professor of economic history at Harvard Business School.

By Tabassum Zakaria
Reuters

Regulation of the financial system to contain risk has not been adequate or effective, he said. “So on the financial front we want to try to find a Goldilocks scenario of not too much and not too little.”

Obama administration officials have had to fend off accusations they were too easy on the financial industry, after the insurance giant AIG paid out millions of dollars in bonuses after accepting billions of dollars in taxpayer funds.

CHARGES OF SOCIALISM

Airing charges of socialism, opponents have sought to turn public opinion against Obama’s big spending policies, including a record $3.55 trillion budget proposed for next year and a $787 billion economic stimulus package.

In the United States calling someone a socialist is often an insult, striking at the heart of American individualism and raising the fear of government fingers in everyone’s business.

The word’s powerful negative connotation prompted Obama to call The New York Times back after an interview to belatedly respond to a question on whether he was a socialist.

“It was hard for me to believe that you were entirely serious about that socialist question,” Obama said, defending his policies as consistent with free-market principles.

“The fact that we’ve had to take these extraordinary measures and intervene is not an indication of my ideological preference, but an indication of the degree to which lax regulation and extravagant risk-taking has precipitated a crisis,” he said.

Read it all:
http://www.reuters.com/article/n
ewsOne/idUSTRE52L0J820090322

41% Say U.S. Focus on Economy Raises Risk of Terrorist Attack

March 12, 2009

“He who defends everything, defends nothing,” said Frederick II (1712-1786).

President Barack Obama is defending everything: the economy, earmarks, his health care plan, environmental plan, energy plan, education reform, government spending, bigger government, the rights to free and open seas (re: China), a stronger U.N., an encircled North Korea, the Muslim world, the power of negotiations (with Syria, Iran, and others), the ramp up of troops in Afghanistan, etc.

You get the idea.

In many ways I see this president as going the right things.  But then again he is doing everything.

He is pro-immigration and today he said he’d send troops to our border with Mexico, maybe.

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03
/12/obamas-border-talk-i-call-bull/

Michelle doubts that.

But then again: doesn’t everything depend upon the economy; followed closely by national security and stoppong terrorists?

But terrorists and terrorism are gone from our public discussion….deleted from the Obama lexicon.

Hmmm.

*****************

From Rasmussen Reports
.
Forty-one percent (41%) of U.S. voters worry that America’s preoccupation with the ongoing economic crisis will make us more vulnerable to a terrorist attack, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey.

But 43% disagree and say it’s not a concern while 16% are not sure.

Forty percent (40%) also say America has more enemies than friends among the nations of the world, although 44% say we have more friends.

Voters are closely divided, too, over whether the current worldwide economic crisis is more likely to create tension between the United States and other nations or more likely to foster cooperation. Forty-four percent (44%) see more tension to come, while 43% expect greater cooperation between America and other countries.

Confidence in how America is doing in the War on Terror dropped dramatically in late February, but it is not yet clear whether the numbers are a statistical blip or a reflection of recent news developments.

Iran continues to be the country the plurality of voters (35%) expect to be the first to seriously test the Obama Administration. Nineteen percent (19%) say North Korea will be the new president’s first major threat, while 12% predict China. Eight percent (8%) say Russia will be the first serious challenger, but one-out-of-four voters (25%) are not sure which country is the greater threat.

Read the rest:
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_con
tent/politics/general_politics2/41_say_u_s_
focus_on_economy_raises_risk_of_terrorist_attack

“Republicans Rape Truth,” and The “Over the Top”

February 12, 2009

You come to us today on your bicycles after buying Girl Scout cookies and helping out Mother Teresa and telling us ‘we’re sorry, we didn’t mean it, we won’t do it again, trust us.’ Well, I have some people in my constituency that actually robbed some of your banks and they say the same thing.”

“America doesn’t trust you any more… I don’t have one single penny in any of your banks — not one…. I don’t want my money put into CDOs and credit default swaps and humongous bonuses.”

That tongue lashing came from Rep. Michael Capuano (D-MASS) to some of America’s top bankers yesterday.

Cute, self-serving and unnecessary.

Here’s a suggestion nobody will follow — aimed at all those involved in political theater: and you know who you are.

Over the top language just used to get your face on TV and, worse, to distort the truth, demeans our political pocess and tells our children that politics and lawmaking is a game of buffoonery for buffoons.

Politics, we have to conclude, is a say anything and get yourself on TV game.

Rod Blagoyevich showed that.

And he got into trouble.

But nobody seems to have learned anything from him.  Blago has been dismissed as an abhorrent aberration.  An abomination.  Shame on him.

But every other jerkweeed still in office can say what he wants.

Over night, nearly every TV report on the testimony of bank executives before Congress started with “Bankers were hauled before Congress yesterday…”

Well, “hauled,” in the care of people and not furniture, is a pejorative use of the word.

People going before Congress are being “hauled” these days because they are about to be pilloried as in exposed to ridicule and abuse.

That’s what it looks like so that is why media thinks “hauled” is appropriate.

Listen to the tone of testimoy and ask yourself, “are we seeking truth? ” Or are we  just being critical in the form of a question?

So you have to expect media to use a word like “hauled” when they  see the antics of Congressmen acting like moneys and putting words into the mouths of those executives they invited to testify.  Often at Congressional testimony the witnesses are  in jobs those we elected could never, ever be expected to do themselves because they just aren’t good enough.

Demonizing executives and others at testimony is demeaning.  Demonizing makes one feel superior, I suppose….  But in the end the practicioners might just end up like Blago (and I hope they do).

The legislators are making a mockery of the systems created by Jefferson and Washington to do what?  Get on TV?  Get reelected?  Distort the truth?  Create wrong impressions?  All of the above?

I remember when party leaders would quietly put an end to childish behavior.  But now there are too few senior legistalors left who have good sense and good manners themselves.

John Warner went home.

Are these antics in hearings meant to show that lawmakers are superior to workers and executives?

Well, you know what?  I just don’t believe that the lawmakers are smarter than anybody….  especially when they need to grab the “over the top” tool so often.

Making money pays taxes and hires people and pays for health care.  Witnesses who make money and provide jobs and pay taxes should be treated with respect.  In fact; we should treat all with respect and allow them to dig their own graves — which is what many lawmakers are generally good at.

President Obama, no virgin at “over the top” language, said Monday night,  “the federal government is the only entity left with the resources to jolt our economy back into life.”

He didn’t even say “good government.”

He also characterized the stimulus debate as a talk between those who had a solution (Democrats) and those who had no solution (Republicans). Of course if this were true there would be no need for bipartisanship — which has been sent to the ash heap after what?  Three weeks?

Can we never be honest? 

No.

Our government has become a pack of dishonest hacks making a mockery of good government.  And that government is about to get even bigger.

Those with some years and wisom watch all this over the top buffoonery on TV and shake their heads in dismay — many of us retired and will die soon, thank God…. with memories of Truman, FDR and Lincoln.

Well, not Lincoln.  That would be over the top.

The youngsters among us might just watch these jerks on TV because they have no jobs and are awaiting the only institution the president says can help: government.

Good luck.

Bad government.

Related:
“Banking Spanking”: Barney Franks Unleashed

Obama: Let’s Be More Honest About Economy, Plans, Republicans

Quotes from the banking hearings:
http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/id
USTRE51A7GY20090211

Here’s What $800 Billion Stimulus Means to America as We Knew It

February 1, 2009
The $800-billion bill that cleared the House last week brings back big government: to school buildings, worker paychecks, electric lines and more. Here’s a look at where the money would go.
By Janet Hook
Los Angeles Times
February 1, 2009
Reporting from Washington — With Congress moving toward passage of an $800-billion-plus economic stimulus plan, big government is back. Unabashed. With a vengeance.

The stimulus is bigger than the Pentagon’s entire budget. It’s more than the United States has spent on the war in Iraq. And its hundreds of provisions reach into almost every aspect of American life — including workers’ paychecks, local schools, digital television and modernizing medical records.

A bank employee counts US dollar bank notes. The euro fell sharply ...
.

Perhaps not since the Great Depression has Congress set out to expand and redefine so dramatically the government’s role in the economy, all in one bewilderingly complex blueprint.

“The three-decade-long period where the default assumption was that government is the problem, not the solution, has clearly ended,” said Bill Galston, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a former aide to President Clinton.

If the enormous stimulus plan succeeds, it’s likely to mean a larger, more activist government for years to come. If the plan is judged a failure — whether because the economic crisis persists or the public becomes disenchanted — the idea of government as an active player in national life could be discredited anew.

Even as Senate Democrats and Republicans begin sparring over the bill, it remains a challenge just to understand what’s in the plan. The version passed by the House last week ran 647 pages; the Senate version, which may come to a vote this week, will probably be longer.

Read the rest:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/was
hingtondc/la-na-stimulus1-2009feb01,0,3984
149.story

Related:
Economic Stimulus About “Soul of America”

Economist Roubini Sees Global Gloom After Davos Vindication

January 30, 2009

At the World Economic Forum two years ago, Nouriel Roubini warned that record profits and bonuses were obscuring a “hard landing” to come. “I really disagree,” countered Jacob Frenkel, the American International Group Inc. vice chairman and former Israeli central banker.

No more. “Roubini was intellectually courageous, and he called the shots correctly,” says Frenkel, whose AIG survives only on the basis of more than $100 billion of government loans. “He gained credibility, and he deserves it.”

This week, New York University’s Roubini returned to the WEF and the Swiss ski resort of Davos as the prophet of the worst economic and financial crisis since the Great Depression – – joining the ranks of previous “Dr. Dooms” who made their names through contrarian calls that proved correct.

Even as he wins plaudits for his prescience, Roubini, 50, says worse lies ahead. Banks face bigger credit losses than they realize, more financial companies will require state takeovers and the world economy will keep shrinking throughout 2009, he says.

“The consensus is catching up with me, but it’s still behind,” Roubini said in an interview in Davos. “I don’t know what some people are smoking.”

‘Catastrophic’

As long ago as February 2007, Roubini was writing on his blog that “the party will soon be over,” and warning of “painful consequences for the U.S. and the global economy.” By last February, his tone had become apocalyptic, raising the specter of a “catastrophic” meltdown that central banks would fail to prevent, triggering the bankruptcy of large banks with mortgage holdings and a “sharp drop” in equities.

The next month, Bear Stearns Cos. failed, to be taken over by JPMorgan Chase & Co. in a government-backed deal. Then, in September, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. went bankrupt, prompting banks to hoard cash and depriving businesses and households of access to capital. The U.S. took over AIG, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index suffered its worst year since 1937.

“I was intellectually vindicated,” Roubini says. “But I was vindicated by having an economic disaster which has political and social consequences.”

Predecessors

Roubini’s predecessors in the role of economic nay-sayer include some well-known names: Joseph Granville, publisher of the Granville Market Letter, who forecast the stock-market declines of 1976 and 2000; Henry Kaufman, who as a managing director at Salomon Brothers projected rising interest rates that led to a U.S. recession in the early 1980s; Marc Faber, publisher of the Gloom, Boom & Doom Report, who predicted the 1987 stock crash; and Yale University’s Robert Shiller, a former colleague of Roubini’s, who forecast the end of the dot-com bubble in his 2000 book “Irrational Exuberance” and said in a second edition in 2005 that the U.S. housing market had undergone the biggest speculative boom in U.S. history.

Granville, 85, says the key to being an outlier is not to doubt your analysis.

“I don’t have anything to do with emotion,” says Granville, who’s based in Kansas City. “Keep your head, follow the numbers and ignore the rest.”

Read the rest:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p
id=newsarchive&sid=a6A9lCHrtAqk

Stimulus Throws Around So Much Money, Some Lawmakers, Families, Executives Get Rich

January 29, 2009

With something like $800 billion in the stimulus bill passed yesterday in the House of Representatives and maybe several trillion more to be decided later for bank bailouts (not to mention the TARP and other bailouts), who will get rich?

If history is any guide, lawmakers, their families and top executives across the country will get rich with your tax money….

*******

By Stephen Dinan and S. A. Miller
The Washington Times

A top House Republican is demanding an investigation into whether the more than $2 billion for national parks in the House stimulus package is proper in light of the fact that the chief lobbyist for the National Parks Conservation Association is the son of House Appropriations Committee Chairman David R. Obey.

NPCA is a major player in advocating for national parks funding, and its senior vice president for government affairs is Craig Obey, son of the Wisconsin Democrat who has long been his party’s top Appropriations Committee member.

The money included in the stimulus bill that passed Mr. Obey’s committee – $2.25 billion – was about equal to the National Park Service’s total yearly budget, and would be a staggering increase and almost three times the $802 million that the Senate Appropriations Committee approved for park spending in its stimulus bill.

Read the rest:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/200
9/jan/29/stimulus-includes-plum-lawmaker
s-son/

America Closer To A Lawless Neighbor, Drug Cartel Rules Border

January 29, 2009

Mexico inches closer to the rule of drug cartels without further resistance from police and other forms of organized government as Americans know it.  The orgainization will all be criminal.

“These criminal kingpins are not afraid of government authority,” said Rand Corp. terror expert Brian Jenkins. “They’re willing to take it on directly.”

Twenty-two people were found shot dead late Monday and Tuesday in northern Mexico, including four found on property belonging to the state-run oil giant Pemex, police said.

The killings are likely the result of the ongoing war between powerful drug cartels for control of lucrative access corridors to the United States, officials said.

Murders of police, judges, government officials and even at Pemex, a stong non-cartel source of revenue, indicate a state slipping toward failure.

That was the conclusion of a U.S. military report earlier this year.

A recent Pentagon report warned that if trends continue into the next decade, the U.S. must be on alert for the possible “rapid and sudden collapse” of Mexico.

Related:
From CBS News:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/01/2
8/eveningnews/main4761209.shtml?source
=search_story

From AFP:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090128/w
l_afp/mexicocrimedrugs_20090128120806

Related:
 Mexico: Top Cops Bribed By Drug Cartel

Mexico: Obama Can’t Ignore Elephant on the Continent
.
 Drugs, Crime Make Mexico “Under Sustained Assault”
.
Mexico: “under sustained assault”; Could “collapse” — U.S. Military
.
 Obama Picks New World “Winners” and “Losers”

Myanmar Humanitarian Trouble Continues: Now More Hunger, Refugees

January 29, 2009

Myanmar is facing a food shortage largely due to last year’s deadly Cyclone Nargis, which destroyed nearly all the rice crops in the fertile Ayeyarwaddy delta, the United Nations said Wednesday.

After the cyclone last year, there were several signs of impending trouble.  The military junta of Myanmar turned away tons of supplies that arrived off shore with the U.S. Navy and made the jobs of relief workers, suppliers and aid groups difficult.

The ruling government even apparently lied lied to the Secretary General of the United Nations Ban Ki-moon when he arrived to help speed relief efforts.

Myanmar has been quiet and unnoticed most of the time since, largely because the government controls the media, keeps unwanted eyes out, and makes money with its oil wealth, lately with new deals with China.

Rice production in the cyclone-affected areas of Ayeyarwaddy and Yangon, the largest city and former capital of Myanmar, is expected to be 50 percent of last year’s, according to the report issued by the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World Food Programme (WFP).

Rat infestation in western’s Myanmar’s Chin State has also contributed to the food shortage, the report says.

“Access to food remains the critical challenge for the poorest people and for vulnerable populations in remote areas of Myanmar,” Chris Kaye of the WFP.

Now reguees are fleeing Myanmar to eat — and some recently arrived in Thailand only to end up in jail.  These are victims of bad government — they only want to eat.

Myanmar, like Darfur, is a humanitarian disaster that has kept going without relief because of bad government.

Related:
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORL
D/asiapcf/01/29/myanmar.food.sho
rtage/index.html