U.N. ‘Climate Change’ Plan Would Likely Shift Trillions to Form New World Economy

Here is why you might think more about a president of the United States that favors a stronger UN and even a world government along with new “climate change” rules, regulations and spending….  We pay: they play….

Don’t forget this is the same UN whose leader called the U.S. a “deadbeat” nation a few short weeks ago:

From March 12: “

Speaking at a monthly briefing with reporters this morning, United Nations Secretary-General (SG) Ban Ki-Moon acknowledged that he referred to the United States as a “deadbeat” donor during a meeting yesterday with members of Congress. A Republican on the House Foreign Relations Committee, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen was clearly irked telling reporters later that the United States contributes “a whole lot of taxpaper dollars to the UN and doesn’t deserve to be called a deadbeat.”

“My point was simply that the United Nations needs the full support of the United States, ” Ban Ki-moon responded at the press conference today. “The United States is our largest contributor, and it is hard to follow up with few funds for growing peacekeeping missions and other activities.”

http://talkradionews.com/2009/03/uns-ba
n-ki-moon-questioned-on-deadbeat-comm
ent-on-united-states-arrears-of-over-1-billion/

********************

 A United Nations document on “climate change” that will be distributed to a major environmental conclave next week envisions a huge reordering of the world economy, likely involving trillions of dollars in wealth transfer, millions of job losses and gains, new taxes, industrial relocations, new tariffs and subsidies, and complicated payments for greenhouse gas abatement schemes and carbon taxes — all under the supervision of the world body.

By George Russell
Fox News

Those and other results are blandly discussed in a discretely worded United Nations “information note” on potential consequences of the measures that industrialized countries will likely have to take to implement the Copenhagen Accord, the successor to the Kyoto Treaty, after it is negotiated and signed by December 2009. The Obama administration has said it supports the treaty process if, in the words of a U.S. State Department spokesman, it can come up with an “effective framework” for dealing with global warming.

The 16-page note, obtained by FOX News, will be distributed to participants at a mammoth negotiating session that starts on March 29 in Bonn, Germany, the first of three sessions intended to hammer out the actual commitments involved in the new deal.

In the stultifying language that is normal for important U.N. conclaves, the negotiators are known as the “Ad Hoc Working Group On Further Commitments For Annex I Parties Under the Kyoto Protocol.” Yet the consequences of their negotiations, if enacted, would be nothing short of world-changing.

Read the rest:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/
0,2933,510937,00.html